Will Bosworth

Category: Uncategorized

On Inventing

Inventing new things is a gratifying part of my career; a list of some of my inventions, as USPTO granted patents, are pasted below. At work I get a lot of questions about how I patent so much. The short answer is 1.) I learned how to write in grad school, and I am more diligent than most people about actually writing down my inventions and submitting them to the patent lawyer; 2.) I intentionally carve out time to be open to inventing: I create a purposeful habit and put in the time; 3.) I try not to be too perfect and I try to be kind to myself when my “new” idea for the week ends up being a dud. Being knowledgeable about my field(s) is helpful to avoid reinventing the wheel, though if I invent something that already exists, I try to use it as positive feedback that my idea had merit.

A few books have influenced my approach on the topic:

FUNdaMENTALs of Design is a textbook that Professor Slocum used when he taught 2.007, the Mechanical Engineering design course. I had the good fortune of taking 2.007 with Alex, and also performing undergraduate research with him; he also oversaw parts of my master’s thesis work.

If you’re not prepared for it, it can be exhausting and intimidating to work with someone who is so full of ideas. But, if properly harnessed it is super inspiring and fun. One grad student in Prof Slocum’s lab once told me, “Alex has an interesting idea every hour, and my job is to figure out which ones are the really good ones.” I think Alex’s book does a great job of describing how to be open to new ideas while also being disciplined about when and how to act on those ideas.

Songwriter’s on songwriting interviews 50+ famous and successful songwriters. Some writers start with words; others start with melodies. Some do it in their heads; some write it down; others record snippets. Some write at 10am every morning, put in their 2 or 3 good hours and stop; others wait until late in the night and binge. One thing is for sure: all of them write a lot of songs. Even “one hit wonders”–those who only get known for writing one song–write a huge amount content.

Thomas Edison is famously quoted, “If you want to have a good idea, have alot of them.” The same is true for any creative endeavor: if you want to write a good song, write alot of them. If you want to invent, invent.

This video of The Police is a neat look into their songwriting process. In 1981, The Police were hugely successful giants, but they still faced the same struggles and process needs as any other creative person.

Bird by Bird is a charming text on famous author Anne Lamott’s approach to writing. I read it over and over again because it makes me feel courageous. I’ve adopted the index card habit from the book: I keep boxes and boxes of “ideas” and other plans, and when I’ve got spare time I open the box and see what I might push on next.

Cargo Utility Biking

In a city where it can sometimes take 30+ minutes to crawl in a car less than a mile, the ability to safely get your kids to school, band practice, art class, creation/engineer camp, swimming or play-time on time is nice. Being able to knock out some chores while they’re doing their thing is also clutch. And, grabbing stuff—dinner, tomorrow’s dinner, toiletries, fun-free-thing-on-side-of-road etc.—without pre-planning is incredible.

Although Somerville is a bike-able city by most standards, an enormous number of my neighbors don’t consider bicycling a viable mode of regular transportation. My advice—to people who already bike, are considering it, or don’t yet—is to get an power-assisted cargo bike. They’re incredibly useful machines that provide enormous flexibility, don’t take up much space, don’t cost much to own, and are fun.

I have a Tern Quick Haul Long, and it rules! There are plenty of brands and dealers, and most of them are great. For extra support, my family also uses Nemo, a mobile bike repair company that will come fix your flat tire if needed. They’re really nice and resourceful.

There’s many others like it, but this one is mine!

Here’s some things I’ve done with my cargo bike recently:

  1. Dropped my kids off at camp, and later picked up a friend’s kid who needed help moving people around
  2. Grocery shopped a week of groceries
  3. Lugged my guitar and amplifier to band practice
  4. Carried one of my kids and her trumpet, and my other kid and her soccer ball to combination music-practice / soccer time.
  5. Picked up an air conditioner from the hardware store
  6. Carried plants home from work
  7. Picked up large load of paper towels on way home from work
  8. Picked up multiple bags of mulch from the gardening store
  9. Carried a broken bike to the bike store
  10. Arrived to home/work/shopping/leisure/chores un-winded and un-sweaty throughout the summer, without experiencing traffic or train delays

When I was younger (two years ago), I rode an acoustic (no motor assist) cargo bike. It was great, and came with even less ownership cost, as well as the extra smugness that comes with riding out of the saddle all of the time. Alas, my kids got bigger and hills did too. At first I was sad to become a regular cargo bike owner, but that wore off quickly after I raced to through a quick day of drop-off, work, mid-day doctor appointment, work, grocery store, home, band practice. There’s simply no better way to zoom from Somerville to Kendall Square, to Copley Square, back to Kendal, back to Somerville with a stop in Union, and over to Everett. You’d spend more time just looking for parking, or maybe $150 in taxi’s. (Should we invest more to make public transportation better? Yes, And!).

Oh, also: get rain pants before you think need them.

A NEMO bike repair vessel, out in the wild.
Families arriving in style to the afternoon school concert

Pizza of the week: The ham sandwich

Last week, my girls attended a birthday party on the same night as Family Pizza. You know what the means? They were already going to be full of pizza, so I had a chance to express myself through the medium of pizza toppings.

This week was also our first go at a Walden Farms meat delivery: 10-ish pounds of assorted meat things, reportedly ethically raised. (Initial impression: Pretty good. Maybe really good). Long way of saying that I was working through a two pound hunk of ham and had a bunch of very-good ham sandwiches all week.

So, how about a ham-sandwich pizza? I was first turned onto pickle pizza by a Hot Box pie I had in the middle of a snow storm at Bow Market a few years ago. At the time, it felt like a risk but turned out to be a revelation.

A homemade pizza spread featuring a ham and pickle combination alongside a plain cheese pizza, complemented by a fresh salad, perfect for a family meal. (Thanks for the caption: AI! Missed the anchovies though.)

For this one, I grated the ham and placed it under the cheese, and put the chopped pickles on top. My wife is not a pickle fan, so only half the pie was fully dressed. Predictably, the unpickled side was a tad overcooked; the pickled side a bit undercooked. My wife said it tasted like a really good ham and cheese panini. I was all around pleased and felt it was worth writing home about.

I cut a bunch of corners: the dough was prepped in a rush; didn’t get to rest as long as it should have; used pre-shredded cheese (gasp). It still turned out: 7/10 for a pizza, so a strong 11/10 on a normal-food scale. The other pizza was plain cheese with anchovies and was also excellent. Fortunately, I left enough plain slices un-anchovied for my kids to top off their birthday pizza. They reassured me that yes, my pizza is better than from the store 🙂 .

Pre-topped pizza and some egregious product placement
Pre-topped pizza, and some egregious product placement.

A recommended structure for technical presentations

The medium length (15 to 45 minute) technical presentation is an important communication medium used in both industry and academia. This post recommends a structure for technical presentations that emphasizes getting the most important points of the presentation out as soon as possible. A common but weaker approach is to develop a linear narrative that builds to a final conclusion, which is nominally the most important information of the presentation.

The two approaches are contrasted in the figure below[1]. In these figures the x-axis is presentation time and the y-axis is information value delivered during the presentation. The top figure describes the linear narrative approach, in which the key insight is not delivered until the final moments of the presentation. The bottom figure shows the superior structure, which immediately emphasizes the most important information. This approach can benefit both the speaker’s preparation and audience members’ ability to attain and digest information.

informationAndTime

The recommended presentation structure seeks to address the most important and interesting information as soon as possible. For example, if your research resulted in building something, show the thing you built as soon as possible. If your research resulted in useful scientific insight, show the insight you developed as soon as possible. Once the cat is out of the bag, the remaining time can be spent focusing on information that bolsters and contextualizes the primary point of the talk. This allows for the presenter to react and respond to audience interest in an unplanned manner – the presenter does not need to stay on a tight script in order to “get to the point,” which enables a richer potential set of context dependent presentations. Similarly, members of the audience struggle less to “figure out the point,” and are more likely to come away from the presentation with something useful if they doze off at some point.

In contrast, in the linear narrative structure the bulk of the presentation time is spent building up a story and “saving” the most important information of the talk for a big finish. At first glance it may seem sensible to arrange a presentation in the order in which work was performed, ending with triumphant completion. For example, a project may have begun with a problem and subsequent hypothesis. Then, an experimental procedure was designed and implemented and the results were analyzed. The results were compared to the hypothesis, and 27 minutes into the 30 minute presentation, the big finish – the exclamation point! – arrives: a scientific conclusion was reached. Additional important information is revealed in the 29th minutes: there is new insight into what scientists may do now. Alternatively, time runs out and we get a rushed conclusion and don’t get to hear about the implications and context of the work ☹.[2]

There may be a time and place for a linear-narrative presentation, but in the context of technical presentations the structure is likely only suitable for a few projects or audiences. This brings up an important wrinkle: the optimal presentation structure should be dictated by the context of the presentation and the needs of the audience. In technical settings, placing early emphasis on important information addresses many common needs of an audience: audience members need some tangible thing to hold onto in order to efficiently filter and categorize the myriad technical details that may be stated or implied during a presentation. Furthermore, they need some tangible reason to justify struggling to spend the next 30 minutes grappling with your particular technical details.

Even gracious audience members may also need a tangible reason to justify why they came halfway across the world (!) to see you talk. This justification leads to my favorite sentence structure for developing and refining the key message of my own presentations: I practice opening my presentation with increasingly ambitious sentences, such as –

• “The reason I’m keeping you in the office an extra hour this afternoon is to show you my cool new thing…

• “I came to Hong Kong today because I wanted to share my cool new thing…

• “Thanks for coming to meet me today to consider giving me $10 billion because you think it could be a great investment. Let me show you my cool thing…


[1] Prof David Trumper sketched this image while providing me useful critical presentation feedback.

[2] The linear-narrative becomes particularly intractable when describing work in which much of the engineering/scientific steps were performed iteratively.